What is one of the aims of the protective services outlined in BH v. McDonald?

One of the primary aims of the protective services as outlined in the case of BH v. McDonald is to protect children from foreseeable and preventable harm. This emphasizes the responsibility of child welfare services to identify risks to children’s safety and well-being and to take appropriate measures to prevent any potential harm. The focus is on proactive measures that can safeguard children by intervening before incidents occur, thereby ensuring that families are supported in ways that prioritize the children's safety and emotional health.

In this context, the other options do not align with the core focus of the protective services. While financial assistance may help families in various ways, it is not the primary aim of protective services. Similarly, eliminating the need for case assessments contradicts the necessity of evaluating situations to ensure children’s safety. Lastly, reducing the number of children in foster care is an important goal but is secondary to the immediate goal of protecting children from harm. The main priority remains the protection of children, highlighting the preventive aspect of child welfare interventions.