According to Norman v. Suter, what should not be the sole reason for removing children from their parents?

The ruling in Norman v. Suter emphasizes that poverty or homelessness alone should not serve as the sole justification for removing children from their parents. This decision is significant because it recognizes that economic hardships can occur in a variety of circumstances and do not inherently indicate that a parent is unfit or that a child is in danger. The court acknowledges the importance of addressing the social and economic factors that may contribute to a family's situation rather than resorting immediately to removal interventions, which can have profound emotional and psychological impacts on children and families.

The focus is on ensuring that children's welfare is prioritized without stigmatizing families facing economic difficulties. This point illuminates the need for child welfare systems to explore and implement supportive services that can assist families in overcoming challenges, rather than removing children from the home based solely on conditions linked to poverty or homelessness.